1619 Project Book Reflection
Teaching slavery is hard, and I would argue teaching slavery to majority Black students is even more challenging. I tell students all the time that given the violence they are currently experiencing in their community the last thing I want to do is re-traumatize them. My goal is to always balance the teaching of Black history while trying to support positive racial identities. I am excited to share that the 1619 Project book has helped me to do this.
I have been teaching African-American History for 10 years, and this year is the first time I have been able to meet the needs and demands of my students. My students are 99.9% Black, and during the past three weeks they have been asking some of the best history questions I have ever experienced.
My students have worked hard in reading excerpts from the 1619 Project essays and primary sources to accompany their understanding of the Atlantic Slave War, the contributions of Black to the United States, and Black resistance. The most rewarding part of thisexperience is to witness the high level of cognitive engagement students are exhibiting as they discuss important details of labor camps, the economy of slavery, and the daily experience of enslaved-people.
In addition, to the original grant award, I have been using the 1619 Project book in the following ways: lessons were developed for Michele Alexander’s and Leslie Alexander and Michele Alexander’s “Fear” essay, and Nikole Hannah Jones’s “Justice” essay. These lessons were taught over multiple days and led to in depth discussion where students made connections between the legacy of slavery and the experience of Black people today. In addition, my honor’s class is analyzing the poetry included in the book. They read a poem for homework, and the next day in 4-5 person literacy circles discussed the meaning of the poem, phrases and words they are trying to understand, and why the poem was selected to be in the book.
One challenge of teaching the essays is determining which excerpts I want students to read. I teach 9th grade, and most of my students are not reading at grade level. I often have to modify the text, and guide students to specific paragraphs I want them to read. One success however was finding relevant primary sources to accompany the essays.
For example, while discussing the relationship between Black resistance and white fear, students studied the Bacon and Stono Rebellion specifically analyzing laws that were passed after the rebellions took place. Students also analyzed letters that were sent between some of the Founding Fathers and early Governors in response to the Haitian Revolution. I teach in Philadelphia, and my students were shocked to read a letter from former Governor Mifflin to President Adams describing his concern regarding the arrival Haitian refugees to Philadelphia. After diving deep into these specific examples white fear, students discussed what steps politicians took to avert any future rebellion and maintain their economic, social, and political privileges. Students were then able to compare this history of white fear to George Zimmerman calling the cops on a hooded Black man in his community and Amy Cooper being threatened for her life by a Black bird watcher.
Another aspect of incorporating the 1619 Project into curriculum is that we have had frequent conversations about how slavery is taught in schools. One of my biggest frustrations regarding any criticism of the 1619 Project is the framing of it. Critics say any teaching of critical race theory or the 1619 Project forces white students to learn about privilege and implicit bias RATHER than celebrating how the 1619 Project provides a means for Black students to investigate the struggles and achievements their ancestors experienced after the arrival of enslaved-Africans.
I recently told my students how my experience of learning about slavery in high school was literally, as Nikita Stewart, argues “a dot on a timeline.” For this lesson students started by reading Marinda Branson Moore’s horrifically racist “Geographical Reader.” After reading this document, students read Stewart’s essay and came up with a list of reasons slavery is mistaught in schools, and discussed the need for more Black teachers. This essay led as a perfect introduction to a lesson I developed on Nikole Hannah Jones’s opening essay “Democracy.” I wrote 1619 vs. 1776 on the whiteboard and told students they were going to debate which year is more important. I divided students into two groups. Half of the class read excerpts from Jones’s essay, and the other half read excerpts from National Review’s Opinion issued this past 4th of July. Students then debated which date is more important and their reasons why based on key claims made in both essays. The beautiful part about this debate is the conversation that happened after. Many of the students truly felt that 1776 was more important AND they still believed “1619” should not be banned from teaching in schools.
After this conversation I shared with them the letter that was sent from parents of the Bryn Mawr Gilman school. Students were angry at the parents’ request to ban critical race theory. They drafted letters to the parents and school in response: writing about the concern they had for the well being of the Black students at the school. We researched the school together and discovered that it does have an African-American History course. Students asked for me to call the school to talk to the African-American History teacher about her experience teaching Black history to a school with majority white students. I was not able to get the teacher’s phone number, but did get her email address and emailed her. No response yet, but I do really hope she emails me back. I would never have done this if it was not for teaching this unit, and student requests and concern for other Black students. Daily they are asking me if I have gotten a response yet.
Abigail Henry’s reflection was originally written as part of the Penguin Random House book pilot program in partnership with the Pulitzer Center.